FieldHockeyCorner.com

2009 Ratings as of November 22, 2:35 pm
by Strength of Schedule (SOS)

Division 3

South Atlantic

  Great Lakes  NE  NE East  NE West  North Atlantic  South South Atlantic West    All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1Messiah22-1 99.90.7380.665
2Rowan14-5 97.70.6700.647
3TCNJ9-6 96.40.6050.606
4Alvernia12-9 95.60.5880.593
5Eastern18-5 96.90.6250.573
6Lebanon Valley19-4 98.30.6360.572
7Montclair State15-6 96.70.5990.561
8Catholic12-7 95.90.5780.560
9King's10-9 95.20.5520.560
10Juniata17-4 96.70.6200.556
11Elizabethtown11-7 96.00.5700.556
12William Paterson9-9 95.10.5420.556
13Susquehanna9-9 94.60.5330.544
14Widener11-6 95.90.5690.543
15Scranton9-10 94.10.5170.531
16Wilkes15-4 96.20.5860.518
17Misericordia6-14 93.00.4590.512
18FDU7-12 93.20.4740.509
19Kean11-5 95.80.5530.508
20Gwynedd-Mercy11-9 94.00.5150.504
21Delaware Valley10-10 94.50.5020.502
22Albright6-13 92.70.4530.498
23Ramapo6-11 93.70.4590.494
24Cabrini11-11 93.50.4930.490
25Manhattanville7-11 92.80.4580.481
26Moravian7-11 93.20.4550.477
27DeSales8-11 93.40.4620.475
28Arcadia5-12 92.30.4260.470
29Richard Stockton4-15 91.90.4040.469
30Drew12-8 94.60.4920.456
31Goucher4-13 92.00.3910.443
32Neumann10-10 92.90.4560.442
33Marywood8-9 92.10.4390.428
34Keystone14-3 93.80.5040.397
35Immaculata5-11 91.40.3740.395
36Rosemont1-12 88.80.3150.395
37Cedar Crest5-12 91.00.3550.375

1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25 * team's record + 0.50 * opponent's record + 0.25 * opponent's-opponent's record

4Strength of Schedule = (2/3) * opponent's record + (1/3) * opponent's-opponent's record

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • These calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The SOS and ACR have no bearing on selection to the NCAA, while the NCAA's official RPI will be produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home